CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8] — Page 333

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

332

in connection with Chinese gaming houses in this Colony,

the difficulty of obtaining such evidence is extraordinary.

5. In Witchell's case this difficulty was

successfully, but with great difficulty, overcome and he was

in my opinion, most properly convicted after a long trial

occupying four days.

6. As regards the Chinese detectives who were

banished under section 19 of Ordinance No.7 of 1891 and sec-

tion 3 of Ordinance 8 of 1882, although it would have been very

difficult, if possible, to have obtained the evidence re-

quired by a Criminal Court, I understand that, in no instance

did they protest that any injustice was done to them and

the moral evidence was ample.

7. The cases of Mr. Osmund and Sanitary Inspector Hore could not, probably, be brought within the scope

of the Criminal Law, and these cases were dealt with by the

Executive Council. They were not officers whose business

"related to the administration of public justice", but they

were charged with misconduct as public officers.

8. Sanitary Inspector Hore was charged with

corruptly receiving bribes from gambling house keepers paid

to a Portuguese woman with whom he had been living for 5

years. He was appointed in January 1895 and the

woman acknowledged having received, for some time, $1 a day,

increased during the last year to $2 a day. She had, during

the last 12 months received, therefore, a sum as large as

Edit History

2026-05-29 07:36:01 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
332 in connection with Chinese gaming houses in this Colony, the difficulty of obtaining such evidence is extraordinary. 5. In Witchell's case this difficulty was successfully, but with great difficulty, overcome and he was in my opinion, most properly convicted after a long trial occupying four days. 6. As regards the Chinese detectives who were banished under section 19 of Ordinance No.7 of 1891 and sec- tion 3 of Ordinance 8 of 1882, although it would have been very difficult, if possible, to have obtained the evidence re- quired by a Criminal Court, I understand that, in no instance did they protest that any injustice was done to them and the moral evidence was ample. 7. The cases of Mr. Osmund and Sanitary Inspector Hore could not, probably, be brought within the scope of the Criminal Law, and these cases were dealt with by the Executive Council. They were not officers whose business "related to the administration of public justice", but they were charged with misconduct as public officers. 8. Sanitary Inspector Hore was charged with corruptly receiving bribes from gambling house keepers paid to a Portuguese woman with whom he had been living for 5 years. He was appointed in January 1895 and the woman acknowledged having received, for some time, $1 a day, increased during the last year to $2 a day. She had, during the last 12 months received, therefore, a sum as large as
Baseline (Original)
332 in connection with Chinese gaming houses in this Colony, the difficulty of obtaining such evidence is extraordinary. 5. In Witchell's case this difficulty was successfully, but with great difficulty, overcome and he was in my opinion,most properly convicted after a long trial occupying four days. 6. As regards the Chinese detectives who were banished under section 19 of Ordinance No.7 of 1891 and seo- tion 3 of Ordinance 8 of 1882, although it would have been we- ry difficult, if possible, to have obtained the evidence re- quired by a Criminal Court, I understand that, in no instance did they protest that any injustice was done to them and the moral evidence was ample. 7. The cases of Mr.Osmund and Sanitary Ins- pector Hore could not,probably,be brought within the scope of the Criminal Law, and these cases were dealt with by the Executive Council. They were not officers whose business "related to the administration of public justice", but they were charged with misconduct as public officers. 8. Sanitary Inspector Hore was charged with corruptly receiving bribes from gambling house keepers paid to a Portuguese woman with whom he had been living for 5 years. He was appointed in January 1895 and the woman acknowledged having received, for some time, $1 a day, increased during the last year to $2 a day. She had, during the last 12 months received, therefore, a sum as large as
2026-05-29 07:36:01 · Baseline
View content

332

in connection with Chinese gaming houses in this Colony,

the difficulty of obtaining such evidence is extraordinary.

5. In Witchell's case this difficulty was

successfully, but with great difficulty, overcome and he was

in my opinion,most properly convicted after a long trial

occupying four days.

6. As regards the Chinese detectives who were

banished under section 19 of Ordinance No.7 of 1891 and seo-

tion 3 of Ordinance 8 of 1882, although it would have been we-

ry difficult, if possible, to have obtained the evidence re-

quired by a Criminal Court, I understand that, in no instance

did they protest that any injustice was done to them and

the moral evidence was ample.

7. The cases of Mr.Osmund and Sanitary Ins-

pector Hore could not,probably,be brought within the scope

of the Criminal Law, and these cases were dealt with by the

Executive Council. They were not officers whose business

"related to the administration of public justice", but they

were charged with misconduct as public officers.

8. Sanitary Inspector Hore was charged with

corruptly receiving bribes from gambling house keepers paid

to a Portuguese woman with whom he had been living for 5

years.

He was appointed in January 1895 and the

woman acknowledged having received, for some time, $1 a day,

increased during the last year to $2 a day. She had, during

the last 12 months received, therefore, a sum as large as

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.